Social impact ventures are not a charity: How Pricing can be a catalyst for change

In recent years, the concept of social impact ventures has gained significant traction as a powerful tool for driving positive change in society. Unlike traditional charity models, these ventures operate on the principle that social and environmental impact can be achieved through sustainable, market-driven approaches.

One particularly unique aspect of social impact ventures is their approach to pricing. While traditional charities often rely on things like donations and sponsors to fund their activities, social impact ventures leverage pricing strategies to not only sustain their operations but also drive meaningful change.

As a result, pricing can be a real catalyst for change with regards to social impact ventures. There are some real-world examples that we will explore in this article of companies that have successfully utilized pricing to achieve both social impact and financial success, showing that it is possible to achieve the best of both worlds.

Current Social Impact Model

There are many different social impact models that companies and organizations currently use depending on their goals, their size, and their structure:

  1. Donations: Some companies rely on donations to fund their social impact initiatives. These donations can come from individuals, other corporations, or foundations. And, they can be used to support various programs that benefit society in some way.
    Example: Charity:water is a non-profit organization that provides clean and safe drinking water to people in developing nations by relying heavily on donations to fund their projects. 

  2. Sponsorships: Through sponsors, companies can promote social impact initiatives and events to support causes aligned with their own values and goals. In some cases, sponsorships can go beyond providing financial support and actually help raise awareness and generate goodwill among the general public.
    Example: Patagonia is a prominent outdoor clothing and gear company that actively sponsors various environmental initiatives that align with their core values of sustainability and conservation. For instance, they have worked with the “1% for the Planet” initiative, where they commit to donating 1% of their sales to environmental causes.

     

  3. Break-even: Some organizations will utilize a break-even model, which is when the revenue from their products covers the costs of these social impact activities. This particular model is especially utilized by social enterprises with a strong focus on corporate social responsibility.
    Example: TOMS Shoes has a “One for One” program where they donate a pair of shoes to a child in need for every pair of shoes sold. The revenue generated from shoe sales is used to cover the costs of producing and donating the additional pair of shoes, allowing the company to sustain its social impact initiatives through its sales.

     

  4. Grants: Grants can be awarded from government agencies, foundations, or other institutions to organizations in order to fund their social impact initiatives. And, these grants are usually determined based on specific criteria and are intended to support community projects.
    Example: Teach for America (TFA) is a non-profit organization that recruits and trains recent college graduates and professionals to teach in low-income communities across the country. They have received substantial funding from government agencies, foundations, and other institutions that are vital for supporting their operations and expanding their reach.

And, these are only a few of the many different models that companies and organizations continue to use today to pursue social impact activities that align with their own values. In fact, many organizations actually even use a combination of these models to fund their initiatives and projects, so the choice of model largely depends on factors such as their mission, resources, and target audience.

Traditionally, these ventures have been viewed as purely charitable organizations, relying on donations and grants to fund their operations. But, one of the fundamental shifts that social impact ventures have brought is that these organizations can place an actual monetary value on the work they do. In general, there is a growing recognition that social impact ventures can generate scalable revenue through their activities and services. 

For social impact ventures, setting a price for their offerings is not only about covering their costs but also about understanding the value of the impact they create. Assigning a monetary value can actually serve as a vehicle to communicate the importance and effectiveness of their product and company to customers, investors, and the wider market. 

 

Scaling pricing can also scale impact 

One of the key benefits of developing a pricing model in social impact ventures is the potential to scale impact. By focusing on pricing to monetize their products, social impact ventures can not only cover costs but also generate revenue that can be reinvested to expand their reach and effectiveness.

Moreover, establishing a monetary value for their products allows social impact ventures to define the value of socially conscious products for customers and the market. This can also expand the value delivery of the venture by  helping attract a broader range of supporters, including customers who are willing to pay for the value they receive. As a result, these social impact ventures can establish value that goes beyond appealing to donors’ heartstrings or guilt. 

Finally, with greater financial resources at their disposal generated through their pricing and monetization, social impact ventures can reinvest in their own initiatives and their people. This can include expanding programs to reach more people, improving the quality of their products , or investing in training and development for their staff. Ultimately, scaling pricing can lead to a multiplier effect, where the increased resources and impact generated by social impact ventures create positive change on a larger scale.

For example, Benentech is a non-profit organization that uses technology to empower communities and create social good. They develop software solutions for various social issues, including education, disability, human rights, and environmental conservation. More specifically, Benetech develops and sells software products and services, such as Bookshare, a digital library for people with print disabilities. To access this service, they charge membership fees that help cover the costs of maintaining and expanding their offerings. Through this subscription-based model, Benetech generates revenue that is reinvested into the organization and used to support ongoing development, operations, and scaling of their social impact initiatives. This particular approach has allowed them to continue innovating and addressing critical social issues without relying solely on donations or grants.

One social impact venture that started as more of a donation based organization but later shifted to a for-profit is VisionSpring, which is a global social enterprise working on creating access to affordable eyewear everywhere. Different from a traditional non-profit, they sell radically affordable eyeglasses to people earning less than $4 per day. They originally began as a non-profit organization focused on providing affordable eyeglasses to developing countries,  relying on donations and grants to cover the costs of production and distribution. Recognizing the need for a more sustainable model, they began incorporating for-profit elements into their operations by selling eyeglasses at affordable prices through local entrepreneurs and vision centers. Thus, once they started generating revenue that could be reinvested into their operations, they began to expand their reach, improve their supply chain, and enhance the quality of their services. And, now, they are more of a hybrid model where they continue to accept some philanthropic support but mostly rely on revenue from sales to fund their activities.

So, by scaling pricing, social impact ventures can not only achieve financial sustainability but also amplify their impact, creating a more sustainable and effective model for driving positive change in society.

For social impact ventures, the traditional notion of relying on donations, sponsorships, and grants is being progressively challenged. As illustrated by various other success stories, pricing can indeed be a powerful catalyst for change. By utilizing pricing, social impact ventures can simultaneously achieve financial sustainability, scale their operations, and amplify their positive impact on society.

For instance, embracing a for-profit model does not dilute the mission of a social enterprise; rather, it can enhance its effectiveness and reach. Organizations like VisionSpring have shown that transitioning from donation-based to revenue-generating models can drive innovation, improve service delivery, and ensure long-term viability. Pricing strategies enable these ventures to reinvest profits into their missions, thereby creating a virtuous cycle of growth and impact.

In conclusion, social impact ventures can be dynamic enterprises that leverage market mechanisms to address social challenges. By strategically implementing pricing models, these ventures can not only cover their costs but also fuel their expansion and deepen their societal contributions. The future of social entrepreneurship lies in this blend of mission-driven purpose and market-based sustainability, proving that doing well and doing good are not mutually exclusive but are, in fact, complementary paths to transformative change.

Did you know?

We shared this article with our email newsletter community first. If you want to get access to our articles and insights before anyone else, you can sign up here (plus, it’s free!)



Found this article helpful?

Sharing is caring. ❤️

Share this on social – super easy 1-click share buttons below 👇 – or send this article to a colleague or friend who can learn something new to empower their company or hustle.